For The Greater Good Of All? How Australians View The Integrity Competence and Contribution Of Federal Government

Twitter
LinkedIn
Parliament House

Subscribe to the leadership newsletter

Fill in your details below to receive monthly leadership insights direct to your inbox.

report foreword

In recent years, as chronicled in countless news stories and reports into trust, public integrity, accountability, transparency and corruption, our institutions of government have become widely seen as places of maladministration and misconduct, more concerned with serving self and vested interests ahead of the public interest. Although these concerns are expressed in relation to all levels of government, they are arguably most pronounced in relation to federal government.

In this special report, the Australian Leadership Index takes stock of the current state of federal government leadership for the greater good, as perceived by the Australian public. By examining public perceptions of government integrity, competence and contribution to public value, overall and against national benchmarks, we reveal the low esteem in which federal government is held and contextualise the results within Australia’s wider institutional landscape.

Importantly, because the restoration of public trust in government must be a bipartisan or multi-partisan effort, we do not differentiate between the Morrison and Albanese governments in the findings presented in this report. Indeed, the administrations are represented fairly evenly in these results, which are based on data collected between October 2021 to March 2023.

Further, because governments are entrusted in public office to act in the public interest, we point to opportunities for political leaders across the aisle to begin to restore public trust in government. Specifically, we identify the factors that foster public perceptions of government integrity, competence and contribution and, in the long run, the sense that government serves the public interest.

KEY FINDINGS

  • FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP BELOW PAR

    As an institution, the federal government is widely seen as enacting moderate leadership for the greater good, performing significantly below the national benchmarks on all leadership metrics: overall leadership, leadership for the greater good, and public leadership.

  • WEAKEST PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC INTEGRITY

    The federal government is perceived to perform poorly on all three drivers of leadership for the greater good: integrity, contribution and competence. It performs especially poorly in terms of integrity

  • OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP

    Competence and contribution matter, but public integrity is critical. The top three drivers of public perceptions of federal government integrity are: (1) perceived honesty of intentions; (2) perceived ethicality of conduct; and (3) perceived sincerity of motives.

Sample details: These results are based a sample collected from October 2021 to March 2023, n = 824 (i.e., the number of observations about the federal government) and n = 20,098 (i.e., the number of observations across the four sectors. The average of these 20,098 observations comprises the national benchmark on each metric).

Federal Government Widely Seen As Incompetent and Lacking Integrity

  • THE GOLDEN QUADRANT

    Institutions in the ‘golden quadrant’ are viewed as having both good intentions and the ability to enact these intentions; both of which are major drivers of public trust.

  • FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SEEN TO LACK COMPETENCE AND INTEGRITY

    As an institution, the federal government could hardly be further away from the golden quadrant in the public mind. From the vantage point of the Australian public, the federal government is seen as ill-intentioned and incompetent, and thus as undeserving of public trust.

Sample details: These results are based on a nationally representative sample collected from October 2021 to December 2022 of n = 18,852 (i.e., the number of observations from Australians who rated any institution across the four sectors), which equates to an average of 754 observations per institution.

ABOUT THE REPORT

The Australian Leadership Index addresses three fundamental aspects of leadership for the greater good in Australia: public perceptions of its state in a variety of social institutions and sectors; public expectations about leadership for the greater good; and the factors that predict or ‘drive’ public perceptions of leadership for the greater good.

To understand public perceptions and expectations about leadership for the good, ALI surveys approximately 1,000 people across all Australian states and territories each quarter. Each participant is asked to rate the performance of 4 randomly assigned institutions (from a list of 25) on leadership and its key drivers, integrity, contribution, and competence.

This report draws on results from our survey data based on a nationally representative sample collected from October 2021 to December 2022, collecting data on each participant’s perceptions of Federal Government leadership across that time period for each of the ALI’s metrics.

Help us to provoke a national conversation about leadership

To get in touch with the Swinburne University research team regarding this research, media enquiries or comments, consulting, education and training, or sponsorship, click the button below.

Get involved

Recent articles and reports